2016-09-14

WHY YOUNG EUROPEANS MUSLIMS DO NOT WANT ANY MORE TO ATTACK THE USA?

"soft-power Counterterrorism" or strategy of "war on hearts", the US had an efficient strategy of "USA branding" to change their image among young European Muslims.

In 2008, a few months after the election of Barack Obama, we conducted a study among 300 young European Muslims (English, German and French). Several questions were put to them, the main three are:

- For them what were the three countries most hostile to the Muslim world? - Why they considered these countries as hostile (they had to give at least two examples of acts, laws, hostile behavior)?

- And if they were prepared to engage intellectually or physically against these hostile countries considered?

It would take too long to come back in details on all the questions and answers here but in summary the results:

-85% Considered the US as the country most hostile to Muslims

-79% Evoked two main reasons namely the torture of American soldiers (Abu Ghraib ect) and killings of Muslim civilians (by non precise targeted air strikes or by the cold-blooded murder of American soldiers)

-72% Said they were prepared to act intellectually or physically against the United States

The survey was conducted unofficially and informally by persons close to the Muslim youth so that they are comfortable and respond naturally.

In 2015, the same question was put to the same target and the results are amazing on two points:

1 The United States is no longer listed as an enemy and anti-Islam country by these young people.
The three countries that have replaced the previous order are in Syria, Burma and France.

2 The United States is even seen as respectful of Islam and Muslims in general.

What happened ? How do these young people have changed their position on the United States?

The answer lies in the amazing American strategy. The United States has implemented a strategy of winning "hearts of Muslims."

A slight flashback to the Bush era is needed.

At that time, despite their media power, military, human or électronic intelligence, the Bush era is a disaster in terms of image for the United States (considered as the great satan) by young Muslims in major European cities. Such a strong hatred of the United States they were tens to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq against them. Aware of this fact, soon after the election of Barack Obama, the US intelligence media strategy makes a 180 degree turn. The objective is now, not to kill his opponents, but to get closer.
Or put another way by the father of political strategy Machiavel:

"If you can kill your enemy, kill him; if you can not, turn him into a friend" (Machiavelli in The Prince)

Does this strategy work? It seems so as shown by the survey of more than 300 young European Muslims.
But concretely, what were the techniques used by the United States:

1) THE  SPEECH IN CAIRO June 4, 2009

When you know that every word, act, speech of US President is studied, analyzed, written, even before being given because it has geopolitical, economic and military consequences real, one will better understand the reasons why the administration US to insist that the Cairo said speech takes place at Al Azhar mosque. One must know that in the beginning, Mubarak wanted the speech takes place in the Egyptian parliamentary assembly but the United States refused and insisted that it takes place in the prestigious mosque.

"A salam aleikoum"

In the heart of Al Azhar, an important place of knowledge of Muslim history, regularly citing the Koran as in a Friday sermon in front of all televisions in the Arab World, a man delivers a speech to a meeting of the Egyptian Muslim dignitaries. This man is not an imam but President Obama.

Here some selected pieces of his speech:

"The relationship between Islam and the West were marked by centuries of coexistence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars. More recently, tensions have been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities many Muslims ... So long as our relationship will be defined by our differences, we will strengthen those who sow hatred rather than peace, and those who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of us to achieve justice and prosperity. This circle of suspicion and distrust must end. "

Drawing a line on the colonial past, he even (below) to endorse the Koranic words that are sacred to every Muslim, which had never be done before by a Western leader.

"I came here looking for a new beginning between us and the Muslim world, a new beginning based on shared interests and mutual respect As stated in the Holy Quran. Be conscious of God and always tell the truth. I will focus here to tell the truth. As a student of history, I learned the debt of the civilization towards Islam. Indeed, it is Islam that carried the light of knowledge for centuries and made possible the Renaissance and the Enlightenment in Europe It also highlights the contribution of Muslims to his country, the United States. "And since our founding, American Muslims have contributed much to the United States. They have fought in our wars, served in our government, fought for civil rights, have set up business, taught at our Universities, excelled in sports arenas " Having valued the role of Islam and the Muslim Whereas the necessary respect as full participant in the World,

Obama becomes the lawyer of Islam around the world!

"The partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it is not. And I think it is partly my responsibility as as president of the United States to combat all the negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. Furthermore, America, freedom is inseparable from freedom of worship. This is why the US government has used the courts to defend the rights of women and girls to wear the hijab and to punish those who would stop them. Similarly it is important for Western countries to refrain from impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit - for example by deciding arbitrarily what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We can not disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretense of defending freedom (this final idea will be repeated again and again in France by Young muslims and change the minds of a lot)

More than the real-politik of which are customary the US as its recent rapprochement with Iran or soft power, such as hundreds of films financed to discredit communism, it's going further. They understand that this old type of communicative process increasingly visible and "coarse" is counterproductive in terms of image for the country "financiers" against Muslim youth increasingly connected to the information and whith a high level of  education.

Instead of trying to influence the other with its values, showing that they are better and that we must follow, it is very close to the other values meaning that the sharing completely. It even goes further meaning than is the defender! The United States no longer say "follow the 'American way of life "that is the best but we respect you, we respect your history, culture and religion".

Beyond this  speech of june 4, this kind of advanced "soft power" or "war of hearts" has declined throughout Europe over time through powerful communication operations.

2) The offensive of American diplomats even in smaller European neighborhoods US diplomats have begun a real seduction campaign at young Muslim neighborhoods even up to share regularly in some iftar to break the fast during Ramadan.

3) The message that American Muslims are part of the elite U S was fully received by young European Muslims. -In The US, widely publicized image of the veiled advisor to President Obama so much was shared and appreciated in European suburbs as any young Muslim (e) today knows. -At Always united states or the subtle and repeated communication insinuating that Obama is a Muslim; communication so well orchestrated it appears sometimes as experienced as insulting to the president himself. So every young Muslim, by the effect of empathy, suffering the daily media stigma in Europe, feeling even closer to this friendly American president and therefore the United States. These more, the U S don’t more appear as in the time of George Bush, as a homogeneous and monolithic anti-Muslim.

ARE THESE MUSLIM YOUNGESTER MORE PEACEFUL TOWARDS THE US?


The animosity against the Americans has dropped significantly among young Muslims in Western Europe. Who can indeed argue that the image of the United States is the same as it was under the presidency of George Bush? Yet America is on the same grounds of war? Holds the same position on the issue of the Middle East?

In the end, today in 2016, , through this strategy, the United States increased their security by means less costly and less harsh than would have been a classic security strategy. On this matter, it was a good play.

2016-09-07

WHY IS COMMUNICATION OF JIHADISTS MANIPULATORS SO EFFECTIVE?

Why is communication of manipulators jihadists so effective? Why and how doest it print  as quickly and deeply in the mind of the manipulated? Do the Manipulators use specific communication techniques?

In many cases, the manipulator benefits social, family, professional or academic loopholes to achieve his goal.
But this fertile ground does not explain everything. Indeed, many young people, before switching in jihadist operations, had balanced and happy lives.
In these cases, how the manipulator does to achieve its ends?
One of the serious consider to understand the phenomenon concerns the construction of the discourse of the manipulator. And neuroscience which, as a grid of reading, may help us to better understand the reasons for the effectiveness of this speech.
Indeed, we know with certainty thanks to neuroscientists many but recent studies that fits a speech (or not) deep into the brain, way short or long-term, depending on the intensity of the emotions it generates one who receives.
Say in a simple way, more a person feels an emotion (joy, humor, anger, fear or sadness) when it receives a message, the message will be with strength and length in her brain.
For example, an experiment conducted by the laboratory Neuro-insight. 150 short ads have been watched by a group of spectators. (we asked them to try to hold back some 50 criteria ) as history, put characters in scene, the elements of storytelling, music...).
The analysis of the results is extremely striking. It shows scientifically essential emotional data in the memorization of communication which were made to them.

Thus,.
·         all ads trying to convince a message through yet encrypted or scientific data have already been badly stored.
·         Instead, all the spots featuring scene of situations, people, ideas, with humor, sadness or fear have strongly been stored.

In fact, each of us can itself inwardly understand the strength of emotions in the process of memorization.
Let us together do a little test. Ask us for example on our schedule of a day any as the 20 August 2010. Who here can remember at least one thing he did that day? Probably not many people.
Now, we ask the same question for September 11, 2001. It is to bet that a lot of people remember exactly what they were doing when the attack on the world trade center towers. In the same way, to stay on the field staff, who doesn't remember his first great fears and joys of childhood while they are far in time (first bike bought, ect). All these events are printed in our brain because ' they are associated with strong emotions.

Throughout the process of manipulation, the manipulator, in his posture, his body language, his speech, his actions, is only through actions or words causing the emotion.
In all the evidence gathered during many interviews, which it would take too long to report in detail, we see the manipulator tried continuously to generate emotion at his victim in order to better penetrate his message.

A few simple phrases are evocative.

(He was always smiling with the right word for make me laugh (joy), it helped me psychologically when nobody believed in me (mutual assistance), he warned me of the risk of suffering in hell after death (fear), he talked to me the delights of Paradise (joy and hope) etc.)






POURQUOI LA COMMUNICATION DES MANIPULATEURS DJIHADISTES EST EFFICACE?


Peut-on parler de neuro-dawa comme il y a le neuro-marketing? Les manipulateurs djihadistes utilisent ils les dernières trouvailles en matière de neurosciences pour hacker le cerveau de leur victimes?
Pourquoi la communication des manipulateurs djihadistes est-elle si efficace ? Pourquoi et comment  s’imprime t’elle  aussi rapidement et profondément  dans l’esprit  des manipulés ? Est-ce que les manipulateurs utilisent des techniques de communication particulières ?
Dans de nombreux cas,  le manipulateur profite  des failles sociales, familiales, professionnelles ou scolaires pour atteindre son objectif d’embrigadement.
Pourtant ce terrain favorable  n’explique pas tout.  En effet,  beaucoup de jeunes, avant de basculer dans des opérations djihadistes, avaient des vies  équilibrées et heureuses.
Dans ces cas, comment le manipulateur fait-il pour arriver à ses fins?
Une des pistes sérieuses à envisager pour comprendre le phénomène concerne la construction du discours du manipulateur. Et ce sont les neurosciences qui, en tant que grille de lecture, pourraient nous aider à mieux cerner les raisons de l’efficacité de ce discours.
En effet, on sait avec certitude grâce à des études neuroscientifiques nombreuses mais récentes qu’un discours s’inscrit (ou non) en profondeur dans le cerveau, de manière courte ou durable, en fonction de l’intensité des émotions qu’il génère chez celui qui le reçoit.
Dis de manière simple, plus une personne ressent une émotion ( joie, humour, colère, peur ou tristesse) quand elle reçoit un message, plus le message s’inscrira avec force et durée dans son cerveau.
Prenons l’exemple d’une expérience menée par le laboratoire Neuro-insight. 150 publicités courtes  ont été visionnées par un groupe de spectateurs. ( on a demandé à ces derniers d’essayer de retenir une cinquantaine de critères comme l’histoire, les personnages mis en scène, les éléments de narration, la musique …).
L’analyse des résultats est extraordinairement frappante. Elle  montre scientifiquement  le caractère essentiel de la donnée émotionnelle dans la mémorisation de la communication qui leur a été apportée. 

Ainsi,
·         toutes les publicités voulant convaincre d’un message grace à des données pourtant chiffrées ou scientifiques ont été mal mémorisées.
·         Au contraire, tous les spots  mettant en scène des situations, personnes, idées,  avec humour, tristesse ou peur  ont été fortement mémorisés.

En fait, chacun de nous peut lui-même comprendre intérieurement la force des émotions dans le processus de mémorisation.
Faisons ensemble un petit test.  Interrogeons-nous par exemple sur notre emploi du temps d’une journée quelconque comme le  20 aout 2010. Qui ici peut se souvenir d’au moins une chose qu’il a fait ce jour-là ? Sans doute pas grand monde .
Maintenant, posons-nous la même question pour le 11 septembre 2001. Il y a fort à parier que beaucoup de personnes se souviennent exactement de ce qu’ils faisaient au moment d’apprendre l’attaque des tours du world trade center. De la même façon, pour rester sur le terrain personnel, qui ne souvient pas de ses premières grandes peurs  ou joies de son enfance alors qu’ils sont bien loin dans le temps (premier vélo acheté, ect). Tous ces événements sont imprimés dans notre cerveau parcequ’ils sont associés à des émotions fortes.

Durant tout le processus de manipulation, le manipulateur, dans sa posture, son langage non verbal, son discours, ses actes,  n’agit qu’au travers d’actions ou de paroles suscitant l’émotion.
Dans tous les témoignages recueillis durant les nombreux entretiens menés, dont il  serait trop long de faire état dans le détail, on s’aperçoit que le manipulateur a tenté continuellement de générer de l’émotion chez sa victime  dans le seul but  de mieux y faire  pénétrer son message.

Quelques phrases simples sont évocatrices.

(Il était toujours souriant avec le bon mot pour me faire rire (joie), il m’a aidé psychologiquement lorsque personne ne croyait en moi (entraide), il m’avertissait du risque de souffrance en enfer après la mort (peur), il me parlait des délices du paradis (joie et espoir) etc.